Read more here | Other recommendations | Further reading
Three months ago, I watched a brilliant software developer walk out of an interview at a Melbourne tech startup because they required “business professional attire.” Not business casual. Full suits. In 2025. For a company that prides itself on innovation.
This isn’t just about fashion preferences or generational differences. It’s about fundamental misunderstandings of what actually drives performance, retention, and innovation in modern workplaces. After twenty-two years of consulting with Australian businesses, I’ve seen dress codes become the silent killer of company culture more times than I care to count.
Most dress codes were written when fax machines were cutting-edge technology. Yet we’re still clinging to them like they’re sacred texts. The assumption that formal clothing equals professionalism is not just outdated—it’s actively harmful to your business outcomes.
Here’s what really gets me fired up: companies spend thousands on workplace wellness programs and mental health initiatives, then force their employees into uncomfortable, restrictive clothing for eight hours a day. The cognitive dissonance is staggering.
I worked with a law firm in Sydney last year that insisted on ties for all male staff. Ties! In a profession where people spend most of their day hunched over computers or in video calls where only their shoulders up are visible. When we finally convinced them to trial relaxed dress standards, their employee satisfaction scores jumped 23% in three months.
But let’s talk about what this is really costing you.
Your dress code isn’t just about clothing—it’s about talent acquisition, retention, and performance. Every qualified candidate who decides your company “isn’t for them” based on outdated appearance requirements represents lost potential revenue.
Young professionals entering the workforce today have fundamentally different relationships with formal wear than previous generations. They associate rigid dress codes with authoritarian management styles, lack of trust, and resistance to change. Right or wrong, that’s the perception you’re creating.
And here’s something that might surprise you: research consistently shows that employees perform better when they feel comfortable and authentic. Comfort isn’t about being lazy—it’s about removing unnecessary cognitive load so people can focus on what actually matters.
The financial impact is real. High-performing employees in creative and technical roles increasingly view strict dress codes as red flags. You’re essentially filtering out exactly the kind of innovative thinkers you need most.
“But our clients expect professional appearance!”
Do they, though? Or is this assumption based on outdated stereotypes about what professionalism looks like?
I’ve worked with clients across industries—from mining companies to healthcare providers to financial services. Know what they actually care about? Competence. Results. Problem-solving ability. Whether you can deliver value.
Sure, there are exceptions. Court appearances, high-stakes client meetings, certain regulatory environments. But requiring business formal wear for someone who works primarily with internal teams or remote clients? That’s just organizational inertia masquerading as customer service.
Netflix has one of the most successful dress codes in corporate history: “Use good judgment.” That’s it. Their employees understand context. They dress appropriately for the situation without needing seventeen bullet points about acceptable heel heights and collar styles.
The most productive client meeting I attended this year involved a Brisbane consulting firm where the senior partner wore well-fitted dark jeans and a quality polo shirt. The client—a traditional manufacturing company—hired them on the spot. Why? Because they focused on solving problems instead of performing respectability theater.
Here’s the thing about professional appearance that most dress codes completely miss: it’s about intentionality and respect, not conformity to arbitrary standards.
A well-chosen outfit that fits properly and suits the person wearing it will always look more professional than expensive formal wear that doesn’t fit correctly or makes someone uncomfortable. But current dress codes prioritise specific garment categories over actual aesthetic coherence.
The best-dressed people I know understand that professional appearance is about:
None of these require suits or high heels.
Let’s be honest about something: formal business wear makes even less sense in the Australian climate than it does elsewhere. Requiring suits in Brisbane’s humidity or forcing people into closed-toe shoes during Perth summers isn’t professional—it’s borderline cruel.
Australian workplace culture has always been more relaxed than our American or European counterparts. Fighting against that cultural grain by imposing unnecessarily formal dress requirements sends mixed messages about your company values.
I’ve seen Melbourne startups lose talented developers to Sydney companies specifically because of dress code differences. When the skill shortage is this acute, every unnecessary barrier to employment becomes a competitive disadvantage.
And don’t get me started on the gender discrimination issues embedded in most dress codes. Requirements that disproportionately impact women—mandatory makeup, specific shoe heel heights, restrictions on hair colour or tattoos—are legal liability waiting to happen.
The smartest companies I work with have moved beyond traditional dress codes to outcome-based appearance guidelines. They focus on context and judgment rather than prescriptive rules.
Some examples that actually work:
Google Australia has essentially no dress code beyond “use common sense.” Their Melbourne office is consistently rated one of the best places to work in the country. Coincidence? I don’t think so.
The key insight here is that professional appearance should support business objectives, not replace them. If your dress code is causing talented people to avoid your company or existing employees to feel uncomfortable and constrained, it’s working against your interests.
Look, I understand the concern about changing established policies. Nobody wants their office to turn into a free-for-all of inappropriate clothing choices. But there’s a massive gap between business formal requirements and having no standards at all.
Start with pilot programs. Trial relaxed dress codes for specific teams or time periods. Measure the actual impact on productivity, client satisfaction, and employee engagement instead of relying on assumptions.
Create context-based guidelines instead of daily requirements. Most people understand the difference between internal team meetings and client presentations. They can dress accordingly if you trust them to use judgment.
Consider seasonal variations. What makes sense in an air-conditioned office in July might be completely impractical in February.
And please, for the love of all that’s holy, involve your actual employees in policy development. The people who have to live with these rules every day have valuable insights about what works and what doesn’t.
Here’s what I’ve learned after two decades of watching workplace trends: true professional appearance isn’t about following rules—it’s about demonstrating respect for colleagues, clients, and the work itself.
Someone wearing clean, well-fitted casual clothing who arrives prepared and contributes meaningful value will always be more professional than someone in expensive formal wear who shows up unprepared or treats colleagues poorly.
Your dress code should reflect your company values, not undermine them. If you claim to value innovation, creativity, and employee wellbeing, but then require rigid adherence to outdated appearance standards, you’re sending conflicting messages.
The future belongs to companies that understand this distinction. The rest will keep losing talent to more progressive competitors while wondering why their culture initiatives aren’t working.
Maybe it’s time to ask whether your dress code is serving your business goals—or just serving tradition for its own sake. Because in 2025, tradition without purpose is just expensive nostalgia.
And frankly, your bottom line can’t afford that kind of luxury anymore.